Biophysical allergy therapy Retrospective study from a medical practice P. Schumacher Summary ft Moyses Introduction Between September 1989 and October 1990, Dr. P. Schumacher of Innsbruck carried out a study of around 200 allergy patients which will be summarised here. In his book Biophysikalische Therapie der Altergieni [Biophysical allergy therapy], in which this study is […]
Category Archives: Scientific Studies
Scientific studies about Bicom therapies using Bicom 2000 and Bicom Optima
Erfahrungsheilkunde Acta medica empirica Journal for medical practice Offprint (vol. 44, issue no, 3/1995) Transfer of molecular information using a bioresonance instrument (BICOM) in amphibian trials (controlled blind study) By: P.C. Endler, M. Citro, W. Pongratz, C.W. Smith, C, Vinattieri, F. Senekowitsch Summary Two independent double-blind studies, performed in Austria and Italy, demonstrated that […]
Prospective randomised study to check the results of treatment using endogenous electromagnetic fields, in the case of slight liver cell damage TRANSLATION FROM THE GERMAN ORIGINAL Introduction The fundamental question of how a living organism such as a human being, which is composed of an astronomical number of cells, is able to coordinate BICOM optima®l […]
Cyril W. Smith, in Hyland and Rowlands (eds), Herbert Fröhlich FRS: A physicist ahead of his time, University of Liverpool, 2006. A book chapter on Fröhlich’s theory of coherent oscillations in living systems, the physics that bioresonance literature most often cites. Theory, not a clinical study.
Twenty two slides from Regumed summarising the Rahlfs appraisal: the level of evidence scheme, and the allergy, asthma, liver cell, overstrain and allergy testing studies with the grade each was given. Manufacturer material, presented as such.
This page summarises a piece of published research that gets cited in bioresonance circles, and sets out plainly why it is not evidence for bioresonance. The study Zimmerman and colleagues, writing in the British Journal of Cancer in 2012, exposed liver cancer and breast cancer cell lines to amplitude-modulated electromagnetic fields at 27.12 MHz. The […]
10
May
May
IGEF and IIREC reports on the Regumed Protector, a device sold for protection against electromagnetic fields from Wi-Fi, mobile phones and DECT handsets. Biophysical testing submitted by the manufacturer. Not a bioresonance therapy study.
Papcz and Barovic, translated and adapted by Rome and Moyses for Regumed. Two groups of top athletes with overstrain syndrome, one treated conventionally and one with BICOM resonance therapy, compared on pain rating, treatment period and number of sessions. Reports a difference favouring the BICOM group.
Schumacher, Innsbruck, 1989 to 1990. A retrospective questionnaire study of around 200 allergy patients from one medical practice, sent out five months after treatment ended. Reports 83 per cent of treated allergies concluded successfully by the patients’ own account. Practitioner’s own caseload, no control group.